Medicines and Miracles
Inside the Battle Between Faith and Psychiatry
written & reported by Rohini Roy
Psychiatry and faith healing clash as people search for mental health solutions. This story uncovers why many still turn to ancient spiritual practices alongside modern medicine.
Part 1 of 4
A small village in one of India’s southern states woke up to a tragic fire twenty three years ago. Little did it know that this incident would alter the course of the nation’s approach to mental health care.
Erwadi in Tamil Nadu was no ordinary place. After all, this village housed the revered dargah (shrine) of Hazrat Sultan Syed Ibrahim Shaheed Badusha, along with other saints who are buried in the dargah’s premises.
For centuries, this dargah had attracted pilgrims from diverse faiths, all drawn by the belief in the shrine’s miraculous powers to cure mental ailments brought on by evil spirits, djinns and black magic.
Its very essence – the water, the oil from the sacred lamps, even the sand beneath one's feet – was believed to hold healing powers.
However, on August 6, 2001 a fire tore through a makeshift faith-based mental home — a type of paid accommodation prevalent in Erwadi — where families could stay with their mentally ill relatives.
Out of the 43 people inside the home, 25 who were shackled, died in the immediate aftermath of the fire. Fifteen who were not shackled managed to escape but three among them later succumbed to burn injuries, taking the total death toll to 28.
This shocked the country and the Supreme Court swiftly intervened.
Authorities shut down all unlicensed mental homes in Erwadi. Over 500 inmates found themselves uprooted, some returned to families, others to state-run hospitals.
Yet, something perplexing happened.
The patients, now in modern facilities, began trickling back to the dargah. "Nobody wanted to be in the hospitals anymore, so they all came back and began to live here again,” Syed Ruknudeen Ibrahim, a shrine trustee, told Scroll.
I heard something similar when I visited two faith healing sites in India this year. People told me they had tried doctors, therapists, and medicines. When nothing worked, they turned to these sites.
It did not make sense – despite the alleged ‘dangers’ - Why were people fleeing modern psychiatric care for faith healing?
Before I even attempt to answer that, I have another question to ask.
Who killed Rebecca Riley?
At just 28 months old, Rebecca Riley was diagnosed with ADHD by psychiatrist Kayoko Kifuji at Tufts-New England Medical Center in Boston.
Rebecca’s mother had told the psychiatrist that she had difficulty sleeping, seemed hyperactive, and was “constantly getting into things, running around, not being able to settle down.” Dr Kifuji prescribed clonidine, a potent sedative typically used for hypertension.
By age three, Dr Kifuji added another diagnosis to the child's medical chart: pediatric bipolar disorder. With it came a cocktail of powerful drugs - Seroquel, an antipsychotic, and Depakote, an anticonvulsant.
Rebecca died at age four. The autopsy revealed that she had died from an overdose of psychiatric drugs, primarily clonidine intoxication.
Her parents were convicted of murder (accused of using the medications to control her behavior and obtain disability payments). However, a juror who voted for the second-degree murder conviction of Rebecca’s mother said, "Every one of us was very angry. Dr. Kifuji should be sitting in the defendant's chair, too."
Despite the controversy, Tufts-New England Medical Center defended Dr. Kifuji's actions. Their spokesperson told CBS NEWS, "The care we provided was appropriate and within responsible professional standards."
To truly grasp what these 'professional standards' are, we must understand the criteria psychiatry uses to define and diagnose ‘mental illness.’
Who is ‘mentally ill’?
The American Psychiatric Association (APA), the largest psychiatric organization in the world, decides what conditions are considered "mental illnesses" by voting on them. It then goes on to list them in a guide called the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.)
The DSM is the holy grail for mental health professionals world over and is updated regularly.
Sometimes, when there's a big shift in society's views, certain illnesses are removed from the list. For example, in 1973, the APA decided that homosexuality was no longer a mental illness, and it was officially removed from the guide in 1980.
In the same 1980 update, new mental illnesses were added, including "child disruptive behavioral disorders.” This category introduced conditions like attention deficit disorder (later renamed attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or ADHD) and oppositional disorder (later renamed oppositional defiant disorder or ODD).
But, is it really that simple?
Unlike physical health, mental health lacks clear biological signs, or biomarkers, to confirm a diagnosis.
For example, a blood test can indicate if a patient had a heart attack by looking for a specific biomarker. But in mental health, there's no such test.
Symptoms like agitation and disrupted sleep could point to depression, anxiety, or early schizophrenia, and diagnosis relies on detailed conversations and questionnaires.
Decades of research into blood and other markers have failed. Mental health disorders are diverse and often overlap. Two patients with depression might share only one symptom, and anxiety frequently coexists with depression.
Allen Frances, a prominent American psychiatrist who led the team for the fourth edition of the DSM, has sounded alarm bells about the broadening of diagnostic criteria in the latest version of the manual (DSM-V).
He believes that the DSM-V is leading to too many people being diagnosed with mental health conditions.
"If anything can be misused, it will be misused, especially if there's a financial incentive," Frances has cautioned.
“And pharma, the big drug companies, have a tremendous financial incentive in making sure that every DSM decision is misused by expansion, so that people who are basically checked well are treated as if they're sick. They become the best customers for pills,” he has said.
He is particularly worried about how this affects children, pointing out that normal behaviors often seen in kids are being labeled as medical conditions.
"We have wild overdiagnosis in attention deficit disorder and autism," he has pointed out.
According to Frances, “their immaturity is being turned into a disease, and kids are being treated with medication for basically just their immaturity.”
So, how do we heal?
The answer to this, perhaps, lies in people’s lived experiences.
Take Sharada’s case, a 35-year-old woman from India, who has been visiting a Mahanubhav temple regularly for the past decade. She told Dr Shubha Ranganathan that she first turned to the temple seeking relief from persistent physical symptoms like pain, fever, and vomiting that conventional medical treatment could not resolve.
The Mahanubhav sect in India offers a unique approach to healing. Their temples, scattered across Maharashtra, provide a refuge for those seeking relief from mental and spiritual afflictions. Emphasizing direct devotional worship to one God, Parameshwar, the sect practices strict monotheism, vegetarianism, and teetotalism.
At the temple, Sharada would enter into trances, and afterwards, she continued to visit regularly. Over time, she began to interpret more of her problems as ‘possession.’ On days when family friction overwhelmed her, she would flee to the temple, knowing she would find refuge there.
For her, the temple was a sanctuary – a space that allowed her to navigate the intersections of physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being.
In another faith healing site in India – Rajasthan’s Balaji Temple – visitors deprive themselves of sleep, eat tasteless or bitter food, restrain themselves in chains, hit their bodies against the walls or move their head in repeated, circular motion for long periods of time to heal.
Meanwhile in New Zealand, Diana Kopua uses her role as the head of psychiatry in Gisborne to incorporate indigenous perspectives into mental health care. She developed Mahi a Atua, a unique approach that utilizes Maori creation stories to understand and treat mental distress among the Maori community.
Similarly in Singapore, dang-ki healing offers another powerful form of indigenous mental health care. Dang-ki healers, or spirit mediums, enter trance states to communicate with deities and spirits. They then help others with their problems.
But, the obvious question here is: if indigenous and ancient faith healing have worked so well, why was modern psychiatric care even developed? History has some answers.
The origins of ‘madness’
The evolution of modern psychiatric care is fraught with power, control and dominance. The way we think about ‘madness’, ‘insanity’ and their treatment has a lot to do with the worldwide colonial project.
Historian Michel Foucault’s work tells us that in the past, madness was simply seen as irrational behavior, no different from physical ailments. The mind and body were viewed as deeply intertwined, with no clear separation.
But by the late 1700s in Europe, perspectives started to shift. Madness became more of a psychological issue, linked to one's moral and mental state rather than just physical health. This change reflected deeper social transformations, as communities prioritized control over treatment.
Institutions like the Hôpital Général in Paris were established not to heal the mentally ill, but to isolate them from society. Foucault suggests this was more about maintaining social order than advancing medical understanding.
In India, traditional texts long before colonial rule described mental illness in terms of spiritual and emotional disturbances. However, British colonial rule introduced a different approach.
Under British rule, behaviors previously seen as part of an ascetic lifestyle in Indian culture, like wandering, were reinterpreted as symptoms of mental illness.
The first lunatic asylum in Mumbai was set up in the 1740s. By the 1800s, the British had established similar facilities across their Indian territories. The Lunacy Act of 1858 legally reinforced the confinement of the mentally ill, intertwining mental health care with colonial control.
Asylums were segregated, with separate facilities for Europeans and Indians, and often forced inmates into labor, turning them into profitable ventures. The British perspective on lunacy was heavily influenced by their own societal norms, including class distinction and the importance of a strong work ethic.
This Western viewpoint was imposed on their colonies, overshadowing rich indigenous approaches to understanding and treating mental health.
In fact, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) too has acknowledged this.
In a public apology, the guild admitted in 2021 that African American and Indigenous people suffering from mental illness were often treated poorly, subjected to abusive experiments and harmful theories under the guise of scientific research.
“Since the APA's inception, practitioners have at times subjected persons of African descent and Indigenous people who suffered from mental illness to abusive treatment, experimentation, victimization in the name of "scientific evidence," along with racialized theories that attempted to confirm their deficit status,” the apology reads.
The body has also said that there are still significant disparities in how mental health conditions like schizophrenia are diagnosed, particularly between white patients and those from Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) communities.
What now?
Like I pointed out in one of the previous sections, there are no clear-cut tests to diagnose mental illnesses. Several experts and critics of the field have said that it then becomes about the patient’s own experience.
What this means is, people suffering from mental distress understand their own experience better than anyone else. They have the capacity and intelligence to know what helps them and what harms them.
So, if someone's dealing with deep, debilitating sadness and they say antidepressants helped them feel better, we have to trust that. On the flip side, if another person finds healing through visiting an indigenous healer, their story is just as valid.
What we must be open to understanding is that the story of mental health is not linear. It certainly isn't a case of we once mistreated the mentally ill and are now enlightened and compassionate because of Science.
Jarrod Clyne's story is a chilling reminder of the coercive practices of modern psychiatric care."I was held down, tied up, forcibly medicated, and placed in a seclusion cell," he writes here.
The disturbing story of Willowbrook, a Staten Island psychiatric facility, tells us that children were deliberately exposed to hepatitis through contaminated drinking water and feces.
Here, here and here, you’ll find more personal accounts of people in psychiatric care, who’ve had harrowing experiences – with medicines, abuse, and neglect.
So, psychiatry is definitely not the infallible savior it often pretends to be. We must confront the uncomfortable truth: Countless individuals have found healing outside its rigid confines, tapping into diverse cultural, spiritual, and personal reservoirs.
In this four-part series, we’ll be telling stories of human distress and the ways people in parts of India chose to deal with it. As someone who has spent countless hours interviewing, listening, and making sense of these stories, I have only one thing to ask of you:
Please be open – to views, experiences, and perspectives that might appear alien, unbelievable, or even problematic at first glance. It might just offer you a perspective on psychiatry, psychology and human suffering that you’ve never encountered before.
(This is the first part of a four-part series on faith healing in India. To read parts two, three and four click here, here and here.)
(With inputs from Dr Ayurdhi Dhar)
Rohini Roy
Rohini Roy has reported on law and social justice as a journalist and now juggles both journalism and copywriting projects. When she's not writing, she’s either lost in a good book, working on embroidery, or enjoying time with her dogs—always with a bowl of hot rice and butter close by!
Rohini Roy